As the federal government’s mine safety czar, Joe Main
has overseen the safest period in U.S. coal mining history. 
The data tell the tale: except for 2010, the coal mine
fatality rate dropped below two deaths per 10,000 miners for the first time
ever between 2009, when Main took over the U.S. Mine Safety and Health
Administration, and 2015, the last year when official fatality data were
available from MSHA.  Through September
30 of last year, preliminary MSHA data indicate the rate will remain below that
benchmark again in 2016. Coal’s injury rate has also shown steady decline, but
the trend has been underway for a decade and a half. 
Despite the rosy results, nine coal miners and 16
metal/non-metal miners died on the job last year. Every mining death devastates
the family involved, a harsh reality that should keep everyone determined to
get to zero. 
How much credit does Main deserve for this run of success?
Skeptics point out he simply may have inherited a falling coal fatality rate.
Main was confirmed as MSHA Assistant Secretary in October 2009, the year the
trend began, and thus could not have had much influence on it then. They also
note his seven-year tenure has been deeply scarred by an explosion at the Upper
Big Branch-South (UBB) Mine that claimed 29 lives and was the worst U.S. coal
mine disaster in nearly 40 years. But, at the time of the explosion in April
2010, he had only been on the job for just five full months, so the lack of
influence argument cuts both ways. 
Here is the place to point out that, although mine
operator Massey Energy was blamed for the tragedy, MSHA could not escape its
own negligence. Taxpayers’ $360 million annual investment in the agency should
produce a better yield than such sad outcomes.  
Critics also contend Main was just lucky: miners can’t
die on the job if there are no jobs, the economic collapse of the coal sector
having brought about that unhappy condition. The downturn was especially felt
among underground mines, which historically have produced the most fatalities. But
as Main himself has pointed out, the fatality rate was low in 2011, a year that
preceded coal’s collapse. 
You also cannot ignore the profound impact UBB had on
coal producers. The accident left everyone in shock due to the common belief at
the time that modern mining techniques rendered fatalities from methane
explosions on the scale of UBB a thing of the past. Their complacency shattered,
producers launched a massive overhaul of how they addressed safety, an effort
that led to safety and health management systems and a goal of cutting
fatalities to zero over five years. Of course, MSHA also stepped up enforcement
across the entire industry as a result of the accident, launching programs and
rules that continue in force to this day. 
Main has consistently kept his eye on the ball; i.e., the
agency’s mission to promote miner safety and health, and he deserves a hearty
attaboy for it. But credit for the positive fatality results must be shared.
Main no doubt agrees with this, but the sentiment often does not come across in
agency public pronouncements. For instance, in a January 3 news release, Main
credited MSHA enforcement, compliance assistance, training, outreach and “improved
compliance” for the favorable statistics. In other words, the achievement was
all about MSHA, giving no recognition to the collective efforts of company
safety policies and programs, the day-to-day work of thousands of corporate
safety officers, safety-conscious individual miners, dedicated training
personnel, state enforcement officials and others. 
(The day after MSHA’s release, the National Mining
Association issued a statement tooting its own horn about NMA’s CORESafety
program. Perhaps this was in response to MSHA’s puffy pronouncement.) 
The agency has always wanted to have it both ways on
safety. When a tragedy occurs, MSHA yelps that responsibility for a safe
workplace rests solely with mine operators, and that government inspectors are
only on mine sites for an average about five percent of the time the facility
is open. However, when the script is flipped, it’s all about MSHA, with short
shrift paid to operators’ efforts. The self-praise might fool Congress and the
public, but it just creates bitterness and resentment within the industry. 
Although he has hardly ignored the issue, Main’s legacy concerning
coal miners’ health is darker.  Autopsies
of the majority of the UBB miners showed the presence of black lung, and the
latest NIOSH data on the alarming prevalence and severity of black lung cases
among former Eastern Kentucky miners is sobering. Still, Main, who saw the devastating
effects of black lung up close in his former position as safety director of the
coal miners’ union, has tried to bring about improvement through awareness, education,
heightened enforcement and a new coal dust rule. He deserves considerable credit
for those efforts but, again, he must share it with coal producers. 
During the Main years, the fatality rate in the
metal/non-metal sector has fluctuated from year to year. Still, the rates are
an improvement over the past, and 2016 will be no exception. 
As Main’s term in office comes to a close, he has adopted
an interesting metaphor to express concern over what he sees as his positive
legacy in mine safety. In a typical flood of words, he was quoted as saying, “There’s
a lot of ingredients that went into the recipe to make the cake that we now
have in terms of having the outcomes of the safest years in mine history. If
you start taking ingredients out of that, the cake’s not going to be as good, I
can tell you that.” 
Thus, to adapt a command falsely attributed to French
Queen Marie Antoinette, the retiring chief executive’s advice to the incoming
mine safety team is to “Let them eat [my] cake.” It is a “treat” whose
ingredients include Rules to Live By, impact inspections, the court-challenged
POV rule, the hugely unpopular coal dust initiative, the Part 75 exam rule and
more. Given those ingredients, the anti-regulatory Trump Administration is
going to find Main’s concoction very hard to swallow indeed. 
Copyright 2017, James Sharpe. All Rights Reserved.
Well said ... and shared on Facebook!
ReplyDeleteMain is to be recognized for being at the helm for much of the improvements but there is much work to be done within the agency itself. Improving efficiency, quality of inspectors and agency training product (and how it is delivered) should be important to the next Assistant Secretary.
ReplyDeleteIt is always interesting to me that MSHA has repeatedly tooted their own horn when it comes to safety improvements in their news releases and public announcements, but when standing before industry groups, they will declare that the improvements are also, and even largely due to industry efforts and initiatives.
If I read the new administration right, it will be imperative that industry be given its proper due and show how business and government works together in an effective and cooperative manner.